豆腐蒸着吃的做法大全:Why NATOs seek a refuge for Qaddafi?? - Focus...

来源：百度文库 编辑：九乡新闻网 时间：2024/05/02 06:22:57

Why NATOs seek a refuge for Qaddafi??


The NATO has just admitted its failure of airstrike over Libya, and the Libya fights between Gaddafi and the NATO is determined to be a stuck dilemma. Gaddafi, standing as a "strongman", according to the NATO's knowledge and experience, apparently won't accept stepping aside conditions from NATO.

But now, US and its allies are busy seeking a regufe for Gaddafi  ——————


NYTimes alliy.jpg (66.04 KB)
2011-4-18 10:52


The Obama administration has begun seeking a country, most likely in Africa, that might be willing to provide shelter to Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi if he were forced out of Libya, even as a new wave of intelligence reports suggest that no rebel leader has emerged as a credible successor to the Libyan dictator.


The intense search for a country to accept Colonel Qaddafi has been conducted quietly by the United States and its allies, even though the Libyan leader has shown defiance in recent days, declaring that he has no intention of yielding to demands that he leave his country, and intensifying his bombardment of the rebel city of Misurata.


The effort is complicated by the likelihood that he would be indicted for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Scotland in 1988, and atrocities inside Libya.


One possibility, according to three administration officials, is to find a country that is not a signatory to the treaty that requires countries to turn over anyone under indictment for trial by the court, perhaps giving Colonel Qaddafi an incentive to abandon his stronghold in Tripoli.


The move by the United States to find a haven for Colonel Qaddafi may help explain how the White House is trying to enforce President Obama’s declaration that the Libyan leader must leave the country but without violating Mr. Obama’s refusal to put troops on the ground.


The United Nations Security Council has authorized military strikes to protect the Libyan population, but not to oust the leadership. But Mr. Obama and the leaders of Britain and France, among others, have declared that to be their goals, apart from the military campaign.


“We learned some lessons from Iraq, and one of the biggest is that Libyans have to be responsible for regime change, not us,” one senior administration official said on Saturday. “What we’re simply trying to do is find some peaceful way to organize an exit, if the opportunity arises.”


About half of the countries in Africa have not signed or ratified the Rome Statute, which requires nations to abide by commands from the international court. (The United States has also not ratified the statute, because of concerns about the potential indictment of its soldiers or intelligence agents.) Italy’s foreign minister, Franco Frattini, suggested late last month that several African countries could offer Colonel Qaddafi a haven, but he did not identify them.

Aznar sees Gaddafi as a "friend" of the West and criticized the Allied intervention in Libya

fien.jpg (30.71 KB)
2011-4-18 10:52


The president of the Spanish Government Jose Maria Aznar has criticized U.S. and some European countries to launch a military strike against the regime of Muammar Gaddafi , despite the Libyan leader had become the last eight years "friend" of the West .


Hours later they met these statements, the Foundation for Analysis and Social Studies (FAES), chaired by Aznar, has clarified that they were spoken at a conference last April 11 and that the president does not consider the Libyan leader "no friend."


The former prime minister and honorary president of the Popular Party, criticized the "Western countries" to attack the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, and he understands that in recent years has been his "friend extravagant."


In a lecture at the business school at Columbia University, Aznar defended the work while Gaddafi has reaffirmed that the ruling "is not stupid." "He has been in power since 1969, when I was a baby. But 2003 thought, these people - United States - invaded Iraq and now can come here and maybe make regime change in Libya, "he said.


In the same vein, he recalled that the Libyan leader has supported "all efforts" of the Western world against terrorism, in addition to abandon "all weapons programs" nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. "And it becomes a quirky friend, but a friend, to make these decisions, and the result is that Western countries will attack, "he said.


And it becomes a quirky friend, but a friend, to make these decisionsThroughout his speech at the conference, which was recorded on a security camera, Aznar has warned of the consequences, in his view, can be derived of the NATO action in Libya. "If you decide to support the rebels, not knowing who they are and not supporting Gaddafi, you must be careful, because if not, your credibility is finished," he assured.


The former prime minister also accused the West of hypocrisy in the democratic movements in the Middle East to remember that the dictators of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, and Tunisia, Ben Ali, was "theoretically friends" of the United States and Europe, but both of them have said 'Goodbye, my friend'. "Instead," the demonstrators in Syria and Iran have sought help from Western countries and the United States and Europe have not done anything. "

New York Times/El pais


So now folks, when you think outside the box and are allowed to see several interesting facts about Gaddafi-West relations:

Libya was previously the French colony, and in Gaddafi's time, it experienced a tough time against the West as well as Gaddafi's long-time cooperation with CIA against the anti-terrorism within Libya.


And consider another several facts about the NATO countries - America has been trapped in two battle fields already - anti-war protesters and the economy recession won't afford a third fight overseas; Barack Obama the U.S. President, Nicolas sarkozy current French President are both busy preparing for their next presidential elections.



So why U.S. and its allies bother seeking a refugee for Gaddafi?  
Please give out us your smart choices of the actual reason that NATO seeks refugee for Gaddafi now!

Poll Options ( multiple choice: choose no more than 4 options, You have to submit your vote to view the result. ) Number of participants 16  

  1. America's excuse to evacuate from a third battle 2. To foster a West-friendly Libya administration 3. To curb the French power in its previous colony 4. For the domestic presidential votes  
Why NATOs seek a refuge for Qaddafi?? - Focus... Why America isn't ready for a disaster Imminent fall of Qaddafi poses challenge for ... Why China embraces N Korea ?? - Focus discuss... J -20, WHY are you so HOT? - Focus discussion... Why China should seek after Inclusive Rise?Li Hongmei's column Property may become focus for investors Beijing's Rules for West: Why Hollywood Lags ... Why Syria's elite keeps silent, for now Why does US block Palestine's bid for enterin... Why does US block Palestine's bid for enterin Miseries abound for besieged Libyans - Focus discussion - People Forum Why？ Taiwan, a ticking time bomb - Focus discussio... Is China developing a VSTOL fighter? - Focus ... 风水 A Place for Everything Why I Quit My Job to Start a Tech Company US-China rivalry still a mismatch - Focus dis... Stalin sees a surge in popularity? - Focus di... NATO: A Victim of U.S. Smothering - Focus dis... Moving into a Post-Western World - Focus disc... Poll: Do we need a carrier? - Focus discussio... A sign for a blind boy makes a difference. Stopping Qaddafi - NYTimes.com