Pentagon stands as bastion of mistrust of China

(Global Times)

08:21, August 26, 2011

The Pentagon released a report entitled Military and Security Developments Involving the PRC 2011 on Wednesday, an annual paper submitted to Congress that tries to gauge China's military power projection and intentions. 

The Pentagon has published its annual report regarding China's military for 10 years and the apprehension it tries to convey is increasingly perceived as pathetic by Chinese people.

The 94-page, six-chapter report covers China's poential new military might, strategy and US-China military contact. Not surprisingly, the latest report raises concerns about Chinese military's strategic intentions. The report acknowledged China's improvement in the transparency of its military affairs, but added that "there remains uncertainty about how China will use its growing capabilities."

The refitting of the aircraft carrier Varyag seems to have exacerbated Pentagon concerns over China's maritime ambition. However, not owning an aircraft carrier as the world's largest developing country until now actually reflected more China's military underdevelopment rather than its sophistication.

The report rightly points out that cross-Straits relationships have made significant progress since 2008, but raises the concern that "the PLA shows no sign of slowing its efforts to develop plans and capabilities for a cross-Strait contingency." The Pentagon actually needs to answer why US arms sales to Taiwan continue and remain the biggest factor of uncertainty stopping mainland-Taiwan relationship from advancing without a hitch. 

The military report also ignored the context of the US strategy of returning to Asia, including the tension the move has created in the South China Sea and East Asia, and what this means for China's national security. Western-backed military interventions in several countries also serve as a reminder of the need to maintain a necessary military capability. Does the Pentagon really need to ask this question? It is prepared for these uncertain security elements that the PLA has apparent "intentions" on.

China and the US are increasingly interdependent economically and while cooperation is highlighted politically, the Pentagon is still stuck in a suspicious mindset between the two countries. As the world shifts toward a multi-polar power structure, the Pentagon report wrongly paints a picture of Sino-US confrontation. It is sowing the seeds for potential future conflicts.

Increases the bookmark

• twitter
• facebook
• Sina Microblog
• digg
• Google
• Delicious
• buzz
• friendfeed
• Linkedin
• diigo
• reddit
• stumbleupon
• Qzone
• QQ Microblog

Related Reading

1. US releases report on China's military
2. Female soldiers march into history
3. PLA commanding officers appraised via integrated platform
4. College students go onboard ships of PLA HK Garrison
5. PLA's operation in S. China routine drill: Defense Ministry
6. Guangdong's coastal defense, control capacities improved
7. GLD establishes culture equipment emergency support mechanism
8. PLA, militia hold joint drills in north China province on Army Day

Leave your comment2 comments

arkhangelsk at 2011-08-26210.177.156.*

The carrier thing: The commentator also forgets the correlation of military forces in the Asia-Pacific Region. Once you take out the United States, China already has an advantageous correlation of force against everyone else. Thus, extra buildup for defensive purposes is only justified against the United States.Yet the carrier is not really as useful against American carriers (the main offensive threat) as extra DF21s or strike fighters or long range cruise missiles would be. Thus it cannot be justified defensively.

PD User at 2011-08-26221.15.10.*

sooner or later it realy needs a lesson.

Weekly review

1. PD interview with U.S.Vice President Joseph R. Biden
2. Aircraft carrier returns to port after maiden voyage
3. China's first aircraft carrier reflects arms buildup
4. PLA commanding officers appraised via integrated platform
5. What explanation does US need about China's aircraft carrier?
6. Guard against impulsive coverage of China's aircraft carrier
7. US should not threaten balance in China relations
8. Why China keeps increasing US debt holdings