九乡新闻网赵州十二时辰歌:中国第一艘航母即将面世 ：看看美国网民震惊评论(
来源：百度文库 编辑：九乡新闻网 时间：2024/04/28 12:47:05
中国第一艘航母即将面世 ：看看美国网民震惊评论(2011-04-19 00:19:02) 标签： 中国第一艘航母“瓦良格”号即将面世 美网民议论纷纷
China Aircraft Carrier Largely Restored: Report
网民评论：
Leo Bloom 12:18 PM on 1/20/2011 89 Fans
American aircraft carrier costs north of $5 billion. Each.
I'll bet anyone Chinese will build this one for about $150 million.
And both will be equally obsolete in awhile.Advantage-- China.
美国航母一艘要花50亿美元
我打赌，中国建的航母只要1.5亿美元。
然后，两者报废的时间差不多
所以，中国占优势
―――――――――――――――CrazyEyes 11:45 AM on 1/20/2011 130 Fans
Welcome to 1918, China.
And while everyone else is downsizing or eliminating carriers as unneccesary, you are building your first.
中国，欢迎回到1918年
其他人都觉得航母没必要，都在缩小规模、废弃航母的时候，你们却要建第一艘航母RubalKhali 06:15 AM on 1/21/2011 379 Fans
When has the U.S. downsized a carrier? Ans aircraft carriers in 1918 had as much in common with what they are now as airplans then and now do. Welcome to reality.
美国什么时候有缩小航母规模了？1918年的航母跟现在差不多，就像1918年的飞机跟现在差不多那样。欢迎回到现实中。
―――――――――――――――
goldiekins 11:03 AM on 1/20/2011 109 Fans
of course they do and we are helping build it. WE have no choice. Everything in our stores is made in China.
当然他们要建航母了，我们还在帮他们建呢。我们别无选择，我们商店里的东西，都是中国制造的。
―――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
larrykat 10:39 AM on 1/20/2011 133 Fans
I don't like it, but how will it feel to have a foreign aircraft carrier possibly sitting just outside our waters? What a change it will bring to our American sensibilities. We will start to learn how other countries have felt over the years, even without "official" aggression. It ain't gonna feel comfy.
我不喜欢这事，一艘外国航母可能会停在我们的水域外，那感觉会是咋样的？这个事将给我们美国人的情绪带来怎样一个变化。我们将会明白其它国家在这些年的感觉是怎样的，虽然没有什么“正式的”侵犯，但还是会觉得很不爽。Joe Adamski 12:09 PM on 1/20/2011 32 Fans
and how does the REST of the world feel about US carriers off their shores?
Do you believe our history of proxy wars and gunship diplomacy make the rest of the world roll over like a puppy wanting his belly scratched?
Militiarily, I doubt this carrier presents much threat. I would hate to see it viewed as reason to ramp up our fleet.
911 was in part the result of US presense in Saudi Arabia, viewed by OBL and Co. as
a desecration of holy ground. Our military presence around the world has certainly made as many enemies as friends . One hopes the Chinese don't see their expanding economic power as reason to arm , and provide counterpoint to the US militiary. Having finally escaped the yoke of the Cold War, it would be extremely stupid to reinstitute it.
那美国的航母停在其它国家的海岸边，他们感觉怎么样？
你真相信，我们历史上干的那些代理战争和舰艇外交，其它国家这样被“整”，都很喜欢？像小狗喜欢挠痒痒一样？
在军事上，我怀疑这艘航母能显示多大的威胁，我不想看到又把它当作个理由，来增加我们的潜艇。
美国在沙特的表现，在某种程度上导致911，被OBL和Co.看作是对圣地的亵渎。我们的军队在世界上的表现，肯定是，树敌跟交的朋友一样多。希望中国人不要把不断扩张的经济势力，当作是提高军备的理由，跟美国军队抗衡。抱着这样希望的人，终于摆脱了冷战思维，要是再重蹈冷战覆辙，真是太傻逼了。
―――――――――――――――
randyjet 10:22 AM on 1/20/2011 130 Fans
I don't think the US Navy needs to worry much. That aircraft carrier will sure be a big target in case of hostilities.
我想美国海军不需要太担心。要是战争，航母肯定是个大目标。
―――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deus Angelus 10:03 AM on 1/20/2011 160 Fans Follow
We still have the super carriers in the Nimitz Class that are far more advanced, carry more aircraft and run on nuclear power. While China flexes their muscle lets not forget that we spend more than all the countries combined on military research and development so we don't even know what we have in our arsenal until it is deployed.
我们还有尼米兹级核动力的超级航空母舰，相当高级，可以运载更多的飞机，而且是靠核动力的。中国展示他们的肌肉，但我们不要忘了，我们花在军事研究和发展上的费用，比所有国家加起来还多，我们都不知道我们军工厂里还有些什么，除非等到部署出来。any mouse 10:45 AM on 1/20/2011 72 Fans
And China has very nice missiles that can easily sink those Nimitz class US carriers several hundred miles from the China coast.
China has developed, tested and deployed US carrier killer missiles.
中国有非常好的导弹，在离中国海岸几百英里处，就能轻易把尼米兹级美国航母给炸沉了。
中国已经发展、试验和展示了美国航母的杀手导弹。Cannonball Taffy O Jones 02:21 PM on 1/20/2011 448 Fans
No, China claims it has carrier killing super missiles but as China also claims that Mao was a genius and that the Great Leap Forward was a brilliant idea I would take their claims with a mountain of salt.
不，中国声称拥有可以炸沉航母的导弹，但由于中国也声称毛是个天才，大跃进是个天才想法，所以呢，我把他们的声明都当放屁。HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DON McDONALD 03:59 PM on 1/20/2011 1401 Fans
The reports I've seen say that China is developing ballistic anti-ship missiles, but they are a long way from deploying them. The US Navy states that at this time we have no defense developed that would protect a carrier from a ballistic missile...however, it's an obvious fact that unlike a low level cruise missile, there would be no possible doubt as to exactly where a ballistic missile came from, and no difficulty sending one right back...
我看到个报道，说中国正在发展弹道反舰导弹，但离真正部署还远着呢。美国海军称这次我们没有发达防御系统，可以保护航母免受弹道导弹攻击…但是，有个事实很明显，这跟低水平的巡逻导弹不同，我们可以很精确判断弹道导弹的来源，然后，很容易就回敬他们一颗…――――――――――――――――
Tenacious Urchin 09:46 AM on 1/20/2011 0 Fans
China will have a Navy eventually. And they will come to protect their interests in the Panama Canal.
中国终于快有海军了。他们会来到巴拿马运河，保护他们的利益。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deus Angelus 10:16 AM on 1/20/2011 160 Fans Follow
You honestly expect the US to roll over and allow this to happen?
你难道真希望美国被“整”？真的能允许这个发生？HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63 03:38 PM on 1/20/2011 165 Fans
At our rate of spending and debt. Who knows where we will be in 5 years.
以我们现在的花费和债务速度，5年后，天知道我们会成什么样
―――――――――――――――――
29bela 09:21 AM on 1/20/2011 151 Fans
Why not? They are the superpower now, aren't they?
为什么不建？他们现在是超级大国，不是吗？
―――――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek 07:43 AM on 1/20/2011 1606 Fans Follow
The United States has never invaded a country with both nuclear weapons and an aircraft carrier. Which explains this action.
美国从来没有侵略过同时拥有核武和航母的国家，这就能解释为什么他们有这样的动作。HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deus Angelus 10:05 AM on 1/20/2011 160 Fans Follow
Japan? (didnt have nuclear weapons) they did have at one point the best carrier fleet did we not defeat Japan and won the Pacific?
日本怎么样？他们没有核武，但他们一度拥有最好的航母舰队，我们还不是打败他们，在太平洋战争中赢了吗？CrazyEyes 11:48 AM on 1/20/2011 130 Fans
The larger, more advanced nations cannot afford to go to war with each other. It would destroy both countries.
越大，越发达的国家，越无法跟对方开战。会两败俱伤的。―――――――――――――――――
Krek 05:19 AM on 1/20/2011 326 Fans
The Chinese are the only permanent members of the UN Security Council without carriers. So, eh, big deal.
中国人是联合国安理会永久成员中唯一没有航母的，所以，啊，好大件事。
―――――――――――――――――
esquilax 04:09 AM on 1/20/2011 240 Fans
They need something to spend all their American money on.
他们得把他们的美元花掉啊。
―――――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick 12:21 AM on 1/20/2011 178 Fans
for some reason, i always thought China had aircraft carriers.
不知为啥，我总以为中国已经有航母了。Chappah 01:17 AM on 1/20/2011 8 Fans
same here. I'm shocked they don't. The Chinese are further behind than I thought...
我也这样想。我很震惊，他们居然没有航母。中国人比我想象中的还要落后。mike72 03:13 AM on 1/20/2011 84 Fans
Because they never have the needs to develope one. Instead they turned their energy in developing their economy.
Now you see how ridiculous that "China Threat" drum beat was.
因为他们从来都不需要建个航母，而是把精力用在发展他们的经济上。
现在，你知道鼓吹“中国威胁”有多荒谬了吧。HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek 04:51 AM on 1/20/2011 1606 Fans Follow
The problem with becoming a world power is you need to be able to defend yourself against jealous aggressors. Let's just hope that the Republicans don't escalate this into an arms race to benefit their buddies in the military industrial complex. We all (Chinese and American) lose in that case.
成为一个世界强国，问题是，你得有能力保护自己，免受猜忌的侵略者的攻击。咱们得希望共和党人不要把这件事升级，提高军备竞赛，让他们的军工业勾结者受益。我们所有人（中国人和美国人）在这种情况下，都会输的。
MajorKong 05:59 AM on 1/20/2011 1216 Fans
It's only recently that China has been developing a "blue water" navy. One that can project power at a distance from their territory.
就在最近，中国已经在发展一支“深海”海军，可以离开他们领土一定的距离，部署势力。
―――――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa 11:51 PM on 1/19/2011 779 Fans
Cool. Ships are easy to sink.
淡定，船很容易就能弄沉的。HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo 06:45 AM on 1/20/2011 253 Fans
you're advocation a war with china - based on what? just for kicks?
你支持跟中国打一仗，为了啥？只是为了好玩吗？vascopyjama 08:55 AM on 1/20/2011 137 Fans
Pretty close to what we base our wars on these days.
就跟我们最近打的那些仗那样HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa 09:09 AM on 1/20/2011 779 Fans
No, but if one were to break out, it's good for the other side to have big, expensive, vulnerable targets.
不是，但如果真的爆发了战争，有这样一个庞大的、昂贵的、容易攻击的目标，很不错。
――――――――――――――――――
Allan888 10:21 PM on 1/19/2011 23 Fans
Ever notice all china armaments look like ours? They just steal stuff. They hardly innovate. Their stealth fighter looks just like ours. Hmmm?
有没有注意到，中国所有的军备跟我们的都很像？他们就只会偷东西，几乎都不能创新。他们的隐形机也跟我们的很像，嗯？MMRDO 10:46 PM on 1/19/2011 194 Fans
The fighter was larger and the engines were different, this is a Ukrainian carrier, not similar to our stuff, most of it is copied Soviet tech.
他们那隐形机更大，发动机也不一样，而这航母是乌克兰的，跟我们的东东不一样，他们这航母主要是复制苏联的技术。OpposingViewpoint 10:51 PM on 1/19/2011 428 Fans
You're right,,,this is the former Ukranian, former USSR carrier "Varyag". I posted some additional information on her but H/P decided my post should go to pending hell for whatever reason.
你说得对。这是前乌克兰的，前苏联的“瓦良格号”。关于这个“瓦良格号”，我发了些相关信息，但这H/P（赫芬顿网站）不知因为啥原因，把我发的评论不知弄到什么鬼地方去了。――――――――――――――――――HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven Waters 09:11 PM on 1/19/2011 64 Fans
OMG China has a mothballed, obsolete aircraft carrier. Guess that means we up our percent of tax dollars to the military from 50% to 65%.This just in... China purchase machetes from Cuba... U.S. responds with new fighter jet that will only cost $250 million each.
噢，天哪，中国有一艘退役的、废弃的航母了。我猜想，这意味着，我们交的税，给军队的要从50%涨到65%了。
这就好比是…中国跟古巴买了一把弯刀…美国赶紧就弄部新的隐形机来防御，而且每部只是“区区”花了2.5亿美元而已。Amryxx 10:33 PM on 1/19/2011 283 Fans
No doubt it will be equipped with very expensive machete-targeting missiles.
很可能，这新的隐形机还会配备非常昂贵的，可以攻击“弯刀”的导弹
――――――――――――――――――BadIdeas 08:58 PM on 1/19/2011 100 Fans
No problem, we're in the process of downsizing our military. Let's hope the Chicoms take over our role protecting freedom around the world. Someone's got to do it!
没问题，我们正在精简我们军队规模。咱们得希望中共分子可以代替我们的角色，在全世界保护自由。这事总得有人去干！
――――――――――――――――――
moose and squirrel 08:50 PM on 1/19/2011 792 Fans
i'd worry more about chinese subs....
我会更担心中国的潜艇meglon978 09:25 PM on 1/19/2011 106 Fans
Why? We're decommissioning outdated ships that are better than 90% of their sub fleet.... unless you're really concerned that all those diesel engines will pollute the oceans.
为什么？我们那些过时的舰船正要退役，比他们90%的潜水艇都还要好…除非你是担心那些柴油发动机会污染海洋。
――――――――――――――――――HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
motoGpifupleez 08:08 PM on 1/19/2011 661 Fans
Oh boy! Now we can justify he expense of a new carrier class composed of at least 5 ships and all the boondoggle F-35's to go with them.
Now you know where the repealed healthcare dollars will go.
噢，孩子！他（指奥黑吧）花钱建了艘新的航母，可以装载5条船，还配备那么些没用的F－35，现在有理由为这事辩护了吧
现在，你们知道他们废除医保后的钱哪去了吧。commentator101 07:31 PM on 1/19/2011 55 Fans
Of course China will have aircraft carriers. Where else are we going to be able to pawn ours?
当然中国会有航母，不然，我们还能去哪典当我们的航母？John Mainstream 07:15 PM on 1/19/2011 121 Fans
China will never have much of a navy. China is too afraid of Japan...who through much of WWII had the best navy in the world.
中国的海军不会有什么了不起的，中国太害怕日本了…日本在二战时，有全世界最好的海军HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
UncleJimbo 07:22 PM on 1/19/2011 2339 Fans
Today China is Afraid of the US......And That's It!......They could Swat Japan like a Fly! ....Seriously!
现在，中国害怕美国…他们打日本就跟拍死只苍蝇一样！…我说真的！imayes 07:29 PM on 1/19/2011 274 Fans
Perhaps we should lift Japan's military restrictions to even out the playing field
军事
分类： 军事武器 简介:噢，天哪，中国有一艘退役的、废弃的航母了。我猜想，这意味着，我们交的税，给军队的要从50%涨到65%了。这就好比是…中国跟古巴买了一把弯刀…美国赶紧就弄部新的隐形机来防御，而且每部只是“区区”花了2.5亿美元而已。China Aircraft Carrier Largely Restored: Report
Leo Bloom
American aircraft carrier costs north of $5 billion. Each.
I'll bet anyone Chinese will build this one for about $150 million.
And both will be equally obsolete in awhile.Advantage-- China.
美国航母一艘要花50亿美元
我打赌，中国建的航母只要1.5亿美元。
然后，两者报废的时间差不多
所以，中国占优势
―――――――――――――――CrazyEyes
Welcome to 1918, China.
And while everyone else is downsizing or eliminating carriers as unneccesary, you are building your first.
中国，欢迎回到1918年
其他人都觉得航母没必要，都在缩小规模、废弃航母的时候，你们却要建第一艘航母RubalKhali
When has the U.S. downsized a carrier? Ans aircraft carriers in 1918 had as much in common with what they are now as airplans then and now do. Welcome to reality.
美国什么时候有缩小航母规模了？1918年的航母跟现在差不多，就像1918年的飞机跟现在差不多那样。欢迎回到现实中。
―――――――――――――――
goldiekins
of course they do and we are helping build it. WE have no choice. Everything in our stores is made in China.
当然他们要建航母了，我们还在帮他们建呢。我们别无选择，我们商店里的东西，都是中国制造的。
―――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
larrykat
I don't like it, but how will it feel to have a foreign aircraft carrier possibly sitting just outside our waters? What a change it will bring to our American sensibilities. We will start to learn how other countries have felt over the years, even without "official" aggression. It ain't gonna feel comfy.
我不喜欢这事，一艘外国航母可能会停在我们的水域外，那感觉会是咋样的？这个事将给我们美国人的情绪带来怎样一个变化。我们将会明白其它国家在这些年的感觉是怎样的，虽然没有什么“正式的”侵犯，但还是会觉得很不爽。Joe Adamski
and how does the REST of the world feel about US carriers off their shores?
Do you believe our history of proxy wars and gunship diplomacy make the rest of the world roll over like a puppy wanting his belly scratched?
Militiarily, I doubt this carrier presents much threat. I would hate to see it viewed as reason to ramp up our fleet.
911 was in part the result of US presense in Saudi Arabia, viewed by OBL and Co. as
a desecration of holy ground. Our military presence around the world has certainly made as many enemies as friends . One hopes the Chinese don't see their expanding economic power as reason to arm , and provide counterpoint to the US militiary. Having finally escaped the yoke of the Cold War, it would be extremely stupid to reinstitute it.
那美国的航母停在其它国家的海岸边，他们感觉怎么样？
你真相信，我们历史上干的那些代理战争和舰艇外交，其它国家这样被“整”，都很喜欢？像小狗喜欢挠痒痒一样？
在军事上，我怀疑这艘航母能显示多大的威胁，我不想看到又把它当作个理由，来增加我们的潜艇。
美国在沙特的表现，在某种程度上导致911，被OBL和Co.看作是对圣地的亵渎。我们的军队在世界上的表现，肯定是，树敌跟交的朋友一样多。希望中国人不要把不断扩张的经济势力，当作是提高军备的理由，跟美国军队抗衡。抱着这样希望的人，终于摆脱了冷战思维，要是再重蹈冷战覆辙，真是太傻逼了。
―――――――――――――――
randyjet
我想美国海军不需要太担心。要是战争，航母肯定是个大目标。
―――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deus Angelus
We still have the super carriers in the Nimitz Class that are far more advanced, carry more aircraft and run on nuclear power. While China flexes their muscle lets not forget that we spend more than all the countries combined on military research and development so we don't even know what we have in our arsenal until it is deployed.
我们还有尼米兹级核动力的超级航空母舰，相当高级，可以运载更多的飞机，而且是靠核动力的。中国展示他们的肌肉，但我们不要忘了，我们花在军事研究和发展上的费用，比所有国家加起来还多，我们都不知道我们军工厂里还有些什么，除非等到部署出来。any mouse
And China has very nice missiles that can easily sink those Nimitz class US carriers several hundred miles from the China coast.
China has developed, tested and deployed US carrier killer missiles.
中国有非常好的导弹，在离中国海岸几百英里处，就能轻易把尼米兹级美国航母给炸沉了。
中国已经发展、试验和展示了美国航母的杀手导弹。Cannonball Taffy O Jones
No, China claims it has carrier killing super missiles but as China also claims that Mao was a genius and that the Great Leap Forward was a brilliant idea I would take their claims with a mountain of salt.
不，中国声称拥有可以炸沉航母的导弹，但由于中国也声称毛是个天才，大跃进是个天才想法，所以呢，我把他们的声明都当放屁。HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DON McDONALD
The reports I've seen say that China is developing ballistic anti-ship missiles, but they are a long way from deploying them. The US Navy states that at this time we have no defense developed that would protect a carrier from a ballistic missile...however, it's an obvious fact that unlike a low level cruise missile, there would be no possible doubt as to exactly where a ballistic missile came from, and no difficulty sending one right back...
我看到个报道，说中国正在发展弹道反舰导弹，但离真正部署还远着呢。美国海军称这次我们没有发达防御系统，可以保护航母免受弹道导弹攻击…但是，有个事实很明显，这跟低水平的巡逻导弹不同，我们可以很精确判断弹道导弹的来源，然后，很容易就回敬他们一颗…――――――――――――――――
Tenacious Urchin
China will have a Navy eventually. And they will come to protect their interests in the Panama Canal.
中国终于快有海军了。他们会来到巴拿马运河，保护他们的利益。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deus Angelus
You honestly expect the US to roll over and allow this to happen?
你难道真希望美国被“整”？真的能允许这个发生？HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
At our rate of spending and debt. Who knows where we will be in 5 years.
以我们现在的花费和债务速度，5年后，天知道我们会成什么样
―――――――――――――――――
29bela
Why not? They are the superpower now, aren't they?
为什么不建？他们现在是超级大国，不是吗？
―――――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
The United States has never invaded a country with both nuclear weapons and an aircraft carrier.
美国从来没有侵略过同时拥有核武和航母的国家，这就能解释为什么他们有这样的动作。HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deus Angelus
Japan? (didnt have nuclear weapons) they did have at one point the best carrier fleet did we not defeat Japan and won the Pacific?
日本怎么样？他们没有核武，但他们一度拥有最好的航母舰队，我们还不是打败他们，在太平洋战争中赢了吗？CrazyEyes
The larger, more advanced nations cannot afford to go to war with each other. It would destroy both countries.
越大，越发达的国家，越无法跟对方开战。会两败俱伤的。―――――――――――――――――
Krek
The Chinese are the only permanent members of the UN Security Council without carriers. So, eh, big deal.
中国人是联合国安理会永久成员中唯一没有航母的，所以，啊，好大件事。
―――――――――――――――――
esquilax
They need something to spend all their American money on.
他们得把他们的美元花掉啊。
―――――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
for some reason, i always thought China had aircraft carriers.
不知为啥，我总以为中国已经有航母了。Chappah
same here. I'm shocked they don't. The Chinese are further behind than I thought...
我也这样想。我很震惊，他们居然没有航母。中国人比我想象中的还要落后。mike72
Because they never have the needs to develope one. Instead they turned their energy in developing their economy.
Now you see how ridiculous that "China Threat" drum beat was.
因为他们从来都不需要建个航母，而是把精力用在发展他们的经济上。
现在，你知道鼓吹“中国威胁”有多荒谬了吧。HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
The problem with becoming a world power is you need to be able to defend yourself against jealous aggressors.
成为一个世界强国，问题是，你得有能力保护自己，免受猜忌的侵略者的攻击。咱们得希望共和党人不要把这件事升级，提高军备竞赛，让他们的军工业勾结者受益。我们所有人（中国人和美国人）在这种情况下，都会输的。
MajorKong
It's only recently that China has been developing a "blue water" navy. One that can project power at a distance from their territory.
就在最近，中国已经在发展一支“深海”海军，可以离开他们领土一定的距离，部署势力。
―――――――――――――――――
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Cool. Ships are easy to sink.
淡定，船很容易就能弄沉的。HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo
you're advocation a war with china - based on what? just for kicks?
你支持跟中国打一仗，为了啥？只是为了好玩吗？vascopyjama
Pretty close to what we base our wars on these days.
就跟我们最近打的那些仗那样HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
No, but if one were to break out, it's good for the other side to have big, expensive, vulnerable targets.
不是，但如果真的爆发了战争，有这样一个庞大的、昂贵的、容易攻击的目标，很不错。
――――――――――――――――――
Allan888
Ever notice all china armaments look like ours? They just steal stuff. They hardly innovate. Their stealth fighter looks just like ours. Hmmm?
有没有注意到，中国所有的军备跟我们的都很像？他们就只会偷东西，几乎都不能创新。他们的隐形机也跟我们的很像，嗯？MMRDO
The fighter was larger and the engines were different, this is a Ukrainian carrier, not similar to our stuff, most of it is copied Soviet tech.
他们那隐形机更大，发动机也不一样，而这航母是乌克兰的，跟我们的东东不一样，他们这航母主要是复制苏联的技术。OpposingViewpoint
You're right,,,this is the former Ukranian, former USSR carrier "Varyag". I posted some additional information on her but H/P decided my post should go to pending hell for whatever reason.
你说得对。这是前乌克兰的，前苏联的“瓦良格号”。关于这个“瓦良格号”，我发了些相关信息，但这H/P（赫芬顿网站）不知因为啥原因，把我发的评论不知弄到什么鬼地方去了。――――――――――――――――――HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven Waters
OMG China has a mothballed, obsolete aircraft carrier. Guess that means we up our percent of tax dollars to the military from 50% to 65%.This just in... China purchase machetes from Cuba... U.S. responds with new fighter jet that will only cost $250 million each.
噢，天哪，中国有一艘退役的、废弃的航母了。我猜想，这意味着，我们交的税，给军队的要从50%涨到65%了。
这就好比是…中国跟古巴买了一把弯刀…美国赶紧就弄部新的隐形机来防御，而且每部只是“区区”花了2.5亿美元而已。Amryxx
No doubt it will be equipped with very expensive machete-targeting missiles.
很可能，这新的隐形机还会配备非常昂贵的，可以攻击“弯刀”的导弹
――――――――――――――――――BadIdeas
No problem, we're in the process of downsizing our military. Let's hope the Chicoms take over our role protecting freedom around the world. Someone's got to do it!
没问题，我们正在精简我们军队规模。咱们得希望中共分子可以代替我们的角色，在全世界保护自由。这事总得有人去干！
――――――――――――――――――
moose and squirrel
我会更担心中国的潜艇meglon978
Why? We're decommissioning outdated ships that are better than 90% of their sub fleet.... unless you're really concerned that all those diesel engines will pollute the oceans.
为什么？我们那些过时的舰船正要退役，比他们90%的潜水艇都还要好…除非你是担心那些柴油发动机会污染海洋。
――――――――――――――――――HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
motoGpifupleez
Oh boy! Now we can justify he expense of a new carrier class composed of at least 5 ships and all the boondoggle F-35's to go with them.
Now you know where the repealed healthcare dollars will go.
噢，孩子！他（指奥黑吧）花钱建了艘新的航母，可以装载5条船，还配备那么些没用的F－35，现在有理由为这事辩护了吧
现在，你们知道他们废除医保后的钱哪去了吧。commentator101
Of course China will have aircraft carriers. Where else are we going to be able to pawn ours?
当然中国会有航母，不然，我们还能去哪典当我们的航母？John Mainstream
China will never have much of a navy. China is too afraid of Japan...who through much of WWII had the best navy in the world.
中国的海军不会有什么了不起的，中国太害怕日本了…日本在二战时，有全世界最好的海军HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
UncleJimbo
Today China is Afraid of the US......And That's It!......They could Swat Japan like a Fly! ....Seriously!
现在，中国害怕美国…他们打日本就跟拍死只苍蝇一样！…我说真的！imayes
Perhaps we should lift Japan's military restrictions to even out the playing field
中国第一艘航母即将面世 ：看看美国网民震惊评论！
中国第一艘航母即将面世 ：看看美国网民震惊评论(
中国天宫一号即将翱翔：看看美国网民震撼评论
外电评论中国即将装备第一艘航母
美国网民对日本地震海啸评论：中国看了很震惊！-中华网博客
中国军舰穿过公海靠近日本岛：看看美国网民震撼评论
本.拉登死了！看看美国网民的震撼评论！
震惊！美媒称中国第一艘航母是个破烂
中国承认利比亚过度委员会：看看俄罗斯网民震撼评论
美国网民评论：中国给巴基斯坦50架JF17战机！
中国首艘航母即将试水——爱国者请过来看看
中国第一艘航母
中国第一艘航母
李娜开创历史先河：看看美国网民的震撼评论！
中国首艘航母即将下水
中国首艘航母即将试航
中国航母即将起航
中国成功发射宇宙飞行器：看看德国网民的震撼评论！
中国.第一艘航母瓦良格号
美军震惊：中国打沉一艘美国航母的后果！ - 军事天地
美军震惊：这就是中国打沉一艘美国航母的后果
美国震惊：中国航母采用曲面甲板电磁弹射器
美国震惊：中国航母采用曲面甲板电磁弹射器 DM
中国最大无人直升机完成试飞：看美国网民震撼评论