金庸群侠传道德:开发中国煤矿的新方法?

来源:百度文库 编辑:九乡新闻网 时间:2024/04/28 04:56:34

据MIT《技术评论》报道:

中国正推动新策略去利用煤炭能源和减少环境冲击:在地底下将煤炭转变成清洁的气体。

上月,中国总理温家宝和英国首相卡梅伦签署了一项15亿美元的商业合作协议,将每年气化6百万吨煤炭,产生1,000 兆瓦电力。英国的Seamwell International公司提供煤炭地下气化(UCG)技术,项目地点是在内蒙古的Yi He煤矿。UCG提供了一种相对干净的方法开采因为太深或太薄而开发起来不经济的煤层。此类煤层在内蒙古估计蕴藏量多达2800亿吨。UCG发电技术所释放的污染空气、温室气体排放和水消耗都比现有火电站较少。

其原理是利用地下煤层的瓦斯气体,通过煤层自身产生的瓦斯来转化形成煤气反应堆,并人工使其加速反应,例如注入氧气和蒸汽来引燃一些地下煤层。据文章报道,这项技术在美国、加拿大等国并未推广,现在却推销到了中国,成了运用该技术在世界上的最大项目,该技术会产生的问题有地下水污染、地下煤层煤气反应堆压力控制、反应堆反应过程控制等,看其内容,很容易让人联想到刘慈欣的科幻小说《地火》,脆弱的内蒙古草原是华北乃至整个中国的生态屏障,而即将引进的这项技术却令人有些害怕。

美国宾夕法尼亚州哥伦比亚县有一个“鬼镇-Centralia”图片),这个小镇因为矿火而被废弃,小镇繁华时期的上世纪60年代有超过5000人在这里生活,而现在2010年只有4个人生活在这里,这里由于地下矿火影响,周围温度很高,人类基本无法生存,平均温度甚至超过水星,矿火始于上世纪60年代早期,而这矿火据计还要燃烧超过250年。 

ENERGY

Exploiting China's Coal While It's Still Underground

Turning coal seams into underground gasification chambers could cut costs and pollution—if done right.

  • FRIDAY, JULY 8, 2011
  • BY PETER FAIRLEY
Audio ?

China is pushing forward with a new strategy for expanding access to coal energy that could also reduce its environmental impact: turning coal into clean-burning gases in the ground.

At a U.K.-Chinese summit in Beijing late last month that included British prime minister David Cameron and Chinese premier Wen Jiabao, a $1.5-billion commercial partnership was launched to gasify six million tons of buried coal per year and generate 1,000 megawatts of power.

The project in Inner Mongolia's Yi He coal field is being advanced by the state-owned China Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Group, and U.K.-based Seamwell International, a newly formed developer of underground coal gasification (UCG) technology. It is the most high-profile of several such proposed projects in China. More than a dozen similar large-scale projects are under development in other countries, including the U.S., Canada, Australia, and Hungary. 

UCG is promoted as a relatively clean method of exploiting coal seams that are too deep or thin to be tapped economically using conventional mining. Such seams in Inner Mongolia hold an estimated 280 billion tons, according to Seamwell. That's more than double the tonnage of recoverable coal in China recognized by the London-based World Energy Council. UCG can also generate electricity from coal with less air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and water consumption than existing coal-fired power plants.

What remains to be proven, however, is whether UCG can operate at large scale without contaminating groundwater. Last week, Australian regulators laid charges against Melbourne-based UCG developerCougar Energy for allegedly contaminating groundwater, and there are signs that this is a rising concern for Chinese regulators.

The chemistry of UCG-based power generation is akin to that of gasification power plants, such as the 250-megawattGreenGen projected expected to start up late this year in Tianjin, China, in which heat and pressure turn coal into a combustible mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen known as syngas. UCG exploits drilling technology to engineer the coal seam itself into an underground gasification reactor. Wells drilled into the coal seam supply air or oxygen, and sometimes steam, to burn some of the coal, and generate heat and pressure to gasify more coal, and then deliver the resulting syngas to the surface.

China's largest pilot project suggests that UCG will be economically competitive, according to data presented this spring by Beijing-based energy giant ENN. Feng Chen, ENN's chief engineer for UCG, reported on 26 months of gasification at a CAN$1 billion ($155 million) UCG operation at Ulanchap, Inner Mongolia, which generates five megawatts of power. He projected that UCG can supply power 27 percent cheaper than plants such as GreenGen that gasify coal above-ground.

Sevket Durucan, a professor of mining and environmental engineering at Imperial College London and a technical advisor to Seamwell, says existing drilling data suggests the roughly 400-meter deep coal seam the U.K.-Chinese group is targeting could support a major UCG project. "There's quite a large deposit there. On paper it looks good," says Durucan. He says that additional drilling will begin this month in Inner Mongolia to confirm the site's promise as well as the project's environmental credentials.

Duru can says that, on average, the carbon footprint of UCG-based power generation should be 20 percent lower than power generation via the pulverized coal-fired power plants that predominate in China, thanks largely to the avoidance of methane emissions from coal mining. It could cut carbon emissions in half if equipment to capture and store the plant's carbon dioxide exhaust is added—an option that Durucan says is under consideration for the U.K.-Chinese project.

This summer's investigations will provide more specific data on the project's likely greenhouse gas benefits. It will also assess the risk posed to groundwater. Burning and gasifying coal underground produces carcinogenic by-products such as benzene. Durucan says groundwater contamination is "a concern that one must consider," but one that can be managed by "how one controls the gasification process and pressures."

Others have a mixed assessment of UCG's potential impact on water supplies. Doug Shaigec, president of Calgary-based UCG developer Swan Hills Synfuels, says the U.K.-Chinese project could benefit China's arid coal regions if it exploits nondrinkable saline water formations to supply the water consumed by the gasification process—something Swan Hills plans to do at its 1,400-meter deep, CAN$1.5-billion ($1.6-billion) UCG project in Alberta. However, he says, proximity to aquifers could be a deal-killer for shallower UCG proposals. "We do not believe that it is appropriate to practice UCG in freshwater aquifers," says Shaigec.

Groundwater concerns appear to have killed Cougar Energy's UCG pilot project in Queensland, which the state's environmental authority shut down last summer after the project's gas production well ruptured and Cougar reported trace levels of benzene and toluene in groundwater. Cougar has contested the shutdown, and issued a statement this week asserting that "there have been no concerns with water quality in local water bores."

But some industry sources back the regulator's decision. "That is Queensland doing their job as they should do it. It wasn't a knee-jerk reaction," says Julie Lauder, CEO of the UCG Association, a Surrey, U.K.-based industry association.

Even in China, which has a less developed system of environmental enforcement, shallower projects may face scrutiny. Cougar Energy announced late last month that local authorities had requested "further technical and environmental details" on the 200-meter deep coal seam and 400-megawatt power plant it proposes to develop in Inner Mongolia's Wu Ni Te coal deposit with Inner Mongolia DeTailong Investment Energy. Cougar says the project, once slated to begin this spring, would now be delayed another two to three months.

Lauder says that aggressive regulation will ultimately protect responsible developers of UCG technology. As she puts it: "At this stage of the game, a bit of bad press can affect everybody."