西安美术学院教师:How humanitarian is Western intervention in L...

来源:百度文库 编辑:九乡新闻网 时间:2024/04/29 08:34:53

How humanitarian is Western intervention in Libya?

17:26, March 22, 2011      

Email | Print | Subscribe | Comments | Forum 
  • Do not abandon hope for peaceful resolution to Libyan crisis

  • Commentary: Prepare for contingencies in China

  • Chinese people understand hardships Japan experiences now

  • Federal Reserve's optimistic policy statement conceals worries

  • Premier Wen: 7 percent growth still shows determination, confidence

  • China's peaceful, confident role

  • China's bright blueprint starts to portray

  • People Daily hailing just-ended 4th session of 11th CPPCC National Committee

  • China is definitely not Middle East

  • Public expectations drive development

  • Increases the bookmark twitter facebook digg Google Windowslive Delicious buzz friendfeed Linkedin diigo reddit stumbleupon


    A rebel fighter looks at burning vehicles belonging to forces loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi after an air strike by coalition forces, along a road between Benghazi and Ajdabiyah March 20, 2011. (Xinhua/Reuters)

    For days, British, French and U.S. forces have been conducting air strikes in Libya. Despite coalition claims that their actions have made steady progress, voices of dissatisfaction and opposition are increasingly louder due to casualties caused by a strike ostensibly carried out in the name of humanitarianism.

    According to the U.S. Army, the operation "Odyssey Dawn," which started on the afternoon of March 19, has largely weakened the capability of Libyan air defense. The first phase of the coalition's mission to control Libyan air territory has achieved success, said Michael Glenn Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States, on March 20.

    The Western coalition emphasized that the first wave of the strike is "limited in scope," but in fact it turned out otherwise, triggering great questions and doubts. Libya's state-run TV station reported that 64 people died and 150 people were injured in the first day of the air strike. Such numbers are definitely going to increase with the ongoing strike.

    The two main purposes of the current air strike are to destroy Libyan air defense facilities and lay the groundwork for setting up a no-fly zone, which will allow Western fighters to cruise on one hand. On the other hand, it aims to stop Gaddafi's eastern aggression and force military troops loyal to Gaddafi to evacuate from Benghazi and other places occupied by Libyan rebels. However, neither of the purposes has been achieved as of now, and Gaddafi is not compromising, either.

    The action implemented by the coalition was authorized by the U.N. Security Council in the name of "humanitarianism" to stop the killing of civilians by Gaddafi. However, the real situation is that casualties might be much higher than before Western interference. Aside from the deaths and injuries caused by the air strike, it will eventually turn into a humanitarian disaster because the interference might turn the civil conflict into a severe protracted civil war.

    Poor Libya is not the first "trial target" that the Western has attacked in the name of "humanitarianism." Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iraq and so on are all the former "targets." Sadly, the "experiment" never really succeeded. As seen from the other two countries, this so-called "humanitarianism" is actually just the first step toward overthrowing of another country's political power.

    The historical experience also tells us that such military interference is only for self-serving political and economic interests or even just out of dislike for some leaders, such as Saddam and Gaddafi, though it is veiled by a humanitarian guise.

    However, it is definitely not under the pure name of "humanitarianism." Then, who is going to clear the name of this cause?

    Therefore, we could see the turning of Arab League's sides from supporting to waving and "regretting" within just a few days. In order to stop the bombing of civilians by Gaddafi, the Arab League appealed to the U.N. Security Council to set up a no-fly zone over Libya and provided a "legal" excuse for France and Britain to advance the 1973 no-fly ban.

    But, Arab League never expected the air strike on Libya could cause such a big disaster, and they may have to share the burden of deaths first. So, the Arab League started to condemn the military attacks on Libya on March 20.

    Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa said what is currently happening in Libya has strayed away from the purpose of setting up no-fly zone approved by the U.N. Security Council. The council's decision was done in order to protect civilians but not at the expense of sacrificing more civilians. The no-fly zone is expected but not bombs.

    Apart from the Arab League, Russia strongly appealed all sides to cease fire to avoid hurting more civilians and opposes to use of military forces indiscriminately. Iran condemns the air strike on Libya and questions Western countries' improper purposes. Chávez, the President of Venezuela, said the air strike could only cause more bleeding. Also, Turkey, as one member of NATO, opposes the behavior of its "partners" and warns NATO that the military interference would result in very dangerous consequences.

    Authored by Tang Zhichao, translated by Wang Hanlu, People's Daily Online
    Related Channel News
    • Sports

    Related Reading

    • French Dassault Rafale aircraft refuels

    • Situation in Libya affects OPEC oil price significantly

    • Western allies bombard Libya for 3rd night

    • Spanish jet fighters return from first operation over Libya

    • French warplanes fly around 400 hours over Libya

    • Obama defends U.S. military air raids in Libya

    • French Air Force ready for mission to overfly Libya

    • Do not abandon hope for peaceful resolution to Libyan crisis

    • French dispatch aircraft carrier to Libya amid tensions

    • Storied B-2 Stealth bombers hit Libya

    Special Coverage
    • Survey for 2011 NPC and CPPCC Sessions
    • Focus On China
    Major headlines
    • Nobel laureate says China's economic restructuring benefits other nations

    • Senior official vows to push forward China's anti-graft work

    • China says IAEA should play bigger role in emergency response to nuclear crisis

    • Hopes are high for domestic GPS system

    • Scientists predict strong thirst for 'human milk'

    • People fleeing disasters nearly book up HK hotels

    • Retirement age will be pushed back: minister

    • China confirms no immediate threat from radioactive leaks in Japan

    • Largest marketplace on China-Vietnam border completed

    • China's new five-year blueprint would bring confidence to the world, says Premier

    Editor's Pick
    Hot Forum Dicussion
    • Voice varies on Libyan air strikes

    • US 'must adjust to China's rise'

    • China enters the Big Leagues

    • The mysterious Chinese J-19 fighter

    • Would new Aussie envoy to China save Rudd out of shadow?

    • China tops US in manufacturing: What's the security implication?

    • US firms doing well in China but worry on future