血珠电影图解:日本核危机撼动美国能源工业

Japanese nuclear crisis impacts US energy industry
As the scale of Japan's nuclear crisis unfolds, the partial meltdown of the Fukushima Daiichi plant has forced a review of nuclear energy policy around the world. Ed Crooks, the FT industry and energy editor, takes stock of the impact on the US nuclear energy industry .日本核危机，福岛核电站爆炸，迫使世界各地加强核能政策的审查。艾德克鲁克斯，金融时报工业和能源的编辑与大家一起分析日本核泄漏对美国能源工业的影响。
【视频在线播放】
',1)">

【电信1】RealVideo /mp3
【电信2】RealVideo /mp3
【网通/教育网】RealVideo /mp3
点击进入商业频道整理稿汇总页面
点击进入多主题版块听写规则(新手必读)
版主提示:
一、若是自己的听写稿, 请发帖时标注'Homework'.
二、若是改稿, 请发帖时标注'on 某某人'并在修改处标红.
三、为了达到最快的下载速度,推荐使用迅雷高速下载本站音频/视频材料.
收藏分享评分

支持普特英语听力就多多发帖吧！您们的参与是对斑竹工作最大的肯定与支持！如果您觉得还不错，推荐给周围的朋友吧~
你的英语水平可以提高多少?
回复引用 分享到人人
订阅道具TOP
jianjwang
发短消息加为好友
jianjwang 当前离线
UID
911397
帖子
6
积分
112
阅读权限
50
在线时间
161 小时
注册时间
2009-1-1
最后登录
2011-3-18


举人

UID
911397
帖子
6
贡献值
112
普币
51
听力指数
11
阅读权限
50
在线时间
161 小时
注册时间
2009-1-1
最后登录
2011-3-18
2#
发表于 前天 11:33 |只看该作者

[Homework]2011-03-17&03-19 日本核危机撼动美国能源工业
The scale of the nuclear crisis continues to unfold in Japan. Non-function with the Fukishima Diagy plant has forced reevaluation of nuclear energy policy around the world.Joining me now to discuss is the Financia Times'
US indusgry and energy editor Ede Chris.
Ede,part of the Japanese quake has bitten a renaisance of nuclear power in US.How the event of last week outto discussion.Well there alread has been a lot of talks about renaisance and been a lot of political support for this .It's been one of the very rare it's the energy policy that republicans and democratics has really been able to agree on support for new nuclear investment on both side of the house and the administration. So they kind of hope it would be raised that we would see quite a few more new nuclear plants being built in US.I think we'd gotta think these events will be throwed into the air. We see a lot of statement from politcians that in past few days in differetn direction, some saying , we do have to review this,we do have to rethink it possible for nuclear powe ,other saying,we 'd gotta press ahead that this doesn't bring fundametally change,our nuclear power in US would haven't made that happen in Japen.But even so,nuclear is such a politically sense industry, why it is the most politcally sense industry is, when you see the kind of stories on the lovely new ,on the front pages of all newpapers. It's bound to have an effect on public opinion.So I think it certainly could help put a break on new nuclear
development in US.
And How was the US  nuclear industry responindg.Well  the reasonable thing which let's not rash to judge that we really don't know exactly what happend so far in Jpan.It's ceratin that we don't know what's going to happend ,we don't know how the situation is going to play out,we don't know what the lessons are.That's of course deadly right that you say that when you think of comprxxx, when you think about XXXX,the worst nuclear crisis we had here in US the nuclear crisis .People said at this point of crisis we had knew 10 percent of what'd  virtually came to know about what is going on here and  a lot of thing we thought we knew at that time literraly turn out to be wroing. So It certainly would be wrong to rush to judgement,what the indusgry is saying is let's hang on,learn the lesson of this ,then take political decisions,natual thing.Then they say the problem is that the public opinion is moving much faster ,faster than  the industry  would like and probaly heading a very different direction.
And in the US,the last nuclear facility was completed in late 70's and only 20 percent of our power comes from nuclear,what and why US shatter away from that enery.Well we had been in a bigger lot because of threeXXXX,when that happened in 1979 that was known a bigger radiation. That was hurt as a result of that ,still  it had a very powerful effect on public.  that there was another public opion being on bomb that really stop any new plants being built.And we had more new coal plants contructed and more gas power station built as well.
Dedication has now changed,the various reason bumply because of concern about fossile running out ,abuse because of climate change '.that's been  one of the bigger arguments that favourably part is that of course nuclear
generation doesn't have any carbon dioxide emission certainly,compared to  fossile fule compound,particully compared  to  coal which bring higher polluton from fossile fues in term of carbon diocide emssion.That seems to
be totting the case in favour of nuclear power .Even some environmentalist become around,they  think ,yes, we do need new nuclear plant here in US.I think all that  calculation now be through out again.
So what's the safer,long time energy implications?I think we could  probaly see more emphasis,emphasis is back now on renewables,more investments in wind forms,sonar panels,that kind of things.But particularly I think the
thing can be really big,benefically in term of energy system,it'd going to be natual gas.I think we would see a lot of burning of natual gas,particularly natural gas power generation.Natual gas power plants are cheap and quick and easy to put up.It's well proven  while still on technology and US has this found fantastic resources of natural gas
,new sources of natural gas now being tapped.people talk about US has reserves to last  hundreds of years of present made consumptions.This is amazing.I think people can and  would use that,not gas isnot cheaper at the
moment they would not stich.Particully when stichy,if you use a lot more in future,but even so I think all are examples of turning nuclear very much toward relying much more heavily on natual gas as fuel of Americal future.
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Checkthe original dictation thread!
阶梯修改编辑太麻烦？用普特在线文本比较！